Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
2.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 120: 110333, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2316548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The differences in host antiviral gene expression and disease severity between vaccinated and non-vaccinated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are not well characterized. We sought to compare the clinical characteristics and host antiviral gene expression patterns of vaccinated and non-vaccinated cohorts at the Second People's Hospital of Fuyang City. METHODS: In this case-control study, we retrospectively analyzed 113 vaccinated patients with a COVID-19 Omicron variant infection, 46 non-vaccinated COVID-19 patients, and 24 healthy subjects (no history of COVID-19) recruited from the Second People's Hospital of Fuyang City. Blood samples were collected from each study participant for RNA extraction and PCR. We compared host antiviral gene expression profiles between healthy controls and COVID-19 patients who were either vaccinated or non-vaccinated at the time of infection. RESULTS: In the vaccinated group, most patients were asymptomatic, with only 42.9 % of patients developing fever. Notably, no patients had extrapulmonary organ damage. In contrast, 21.4 % of patients in the non-vaccinated group developed severe/critical (SC) disease and 78.6 % had mild/moderate (MM) disease, with fever occurring in 74.2 % patients. We found that Omicron infection in COVID-19 vaccinated patients was associated with significantly increased expression of several important host antiviral genes including IL12B, IL13, CXCL11, CXCL9, IFNA2, IFNA1, IFNγ, and TNFα. CONCLUSION: Vaccinated patients infected with the Omicron variant were mostly asymptomatic. In contrast, non-vaccinated patients frequently developed SC or MM disease. Older patients with SC COVID-19 also had a higher occurrence of mild liver dysfunction. Omicron infection in COVID-19 vaccinated patients was associated with the activation of key host antiviral genes and thus may play a role in reducing disease severity.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , China/epidemiology , Vaccination , Disease Outbreaks , Fever , Gene Expression
3.
Front Microbiol ; 13: 782421, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742229

ABSTRACT

While IgM and IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively studied, relatively little is known about secretory IgA (sIgA) response in respiratory mucosa. Here we report IgA response to the SARS-CoV-2 in sputum, throat swabs, and serum with nucleocapsid protein (NP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in a cohort of 28 COVID-19 patients and 55 vaccine recipients. The assays showed sIgA in respiratory mucosa could be detected on the first day after illness onset (AIO), and the median conversion time for sIgA in sputum, throat swabs, and serum was 3, 4, and 10 days, respectively. The positive rates of sIgA first week AIO were 100% (24/28) and 85.7% (24/28) in sputum and throat swabs, respectively, and were both 100% during the mid-onset (2-3 weeks AIO). During the recovery period, sIgA positive rates in sputum and throat swabs gradually decreased from 60.7% (17/28) and 57.1% (16/28) 1 month AIO and the sIgA antibodies were all undetectable 6 months AIO. However, serum IgA positive rate was still 100% at 4 months and 53.6% (15/28) at 6 months. Throat swabs obtained from volunteers who received inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines by intramuscular delivery all showed negative results in IgA ELISA. These findings will likely improve our understanding of respiratory mucosal immunity of this emerging disease and help in containing the pandemic and developing vaccines.

6.
The BMJ ; 369(M1849), 2020.
Article in English | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-1495142

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). Design: Multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial. Setting 16 government designated covid-19 treatment centres in China, 11 to 29 February 2020. Participants: 150 patients admitted to hospital with laboratory confirmed covid-19 were included in the intention to treat analysis (75 patients assigned to hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care, 75 to standard of care alone). Interventions Hydroxychloroquine administrated at a loading dose of 1200 mg daily for three days followed by a maintenance dose of 800 mg daily (total treatment duration: two or three weeks for patients with mild to moderate or severe disease, respectively). Main outcome measure: Negative conversion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by 28 days, analysed according to the intention to treat principle. Adverse events were analysed in the safety population in which hydroxychloroquine recipients were participants who received at least one dose of hydroxychloroquine and hydroxychloroquine non-recipients were those managed with standard of care alone.

9.
Pediatr Investig ; 5(3): 203-210, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1353594

ABSTRACT

Importance: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic poses a considerable challenge for pediatricians. Objective: This study aimed to identify the epidemiological characteristics and clinical features of pediatric patients with COVID-19 in China. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included pediatric patients from 46 hospitals in China, covering 12 provinces and two municipalities. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed. Results: In total, 211 pediatric patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. The median age was 7.0 years (range: 22 days to 18 years). Approximately 16.3% of the patients exhibited asymptomatic infections, 23.0% had upper respiratory tract infections, and 60.7% had pneumonia, including two with severe pneumonia and one with critical illness. Approximately 78.7% of the pediatric patients occurred in familial clusters. The most three common symptoms or signs at onset in children with COVID-19 were fever (54.5%), cough (49.3%), and pharyngeal congestion (20.8%). Only 17.6% of the patients presented with decreased lymphocyte count, whereas 13.6% had increased lymphocyte count. Among the patients with pneumonia who exhibited abnormal chest computed tomography findings, 18.2% (23/127) of the patients had no other symptoms. Generally, the chest radiographs showed abnormalities that affected both lungs (49.6%); ground-glass opacity (47.2%) was the most common manifestation. The cure and improvement rates were 86.7% (183/211) and 13.3% (28/211), respectively. Only one patient with an underlying condition received invasive mechanical ventilation; none of the patients died. Interpretation: Similar to adults, children of all age groups are susceptible to COVID-19. Fortunately, most pediatric patients have mild symptoms or remain asymptomatic, despite the high incidence of pneumonia. Decreased proportions of white blood cells and lymphocytes are less frequent in children than in adults.

10.
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine ; 29(7):901-907, 2020.
Article in Chinese | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-1344408

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) and the factors influencing mild eases developing into severe cases, so as to provide a basis for clinical screening, prevention and treatment of potential severe cases.

11.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 11: 663884, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1317217

ABSTRACT

Background: The pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) brings new challenges for pediatricians, especially in the differentiation with non-COVID-19 pneumonia in the peak season of pneumonia. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with COVID-19 and other respiratory pathogens infected pneumonias. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, cross-sectional study of pediatric inpatients in China. Based on pathogenic test results, pediatric patients were divided into three groups, including COVID-19 pneumonia group, Non-COVID-19 viral (NCV) pneumonia group and Non-viral (NV) pneumonia group. Their clinical characteristics were compared by Kruskal-Wallis H test or chi-square test. Results: A total of 636 pediatric pneumonia inpatients, among which 87 in COVID-19 group, 194 in NCV group, and 355 in NV group, were included in analysis. Compared with NCV and NV patients, COVID-19 patients were older (median age 6.33, IQR 2.00-12.00 years), and relatively fewer COVID-19 patients presented fever (63.2%), cough (60.9%), shortness of breath (1.1%), and abnormal pulmonary auscultation (18.4%). The results were verified by the comparison of COVID-19, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A (IFA) pneumonia patients. Approximately 42.5%, 44.8%, and 12.6% of the COVID-19 patients presented simply ground-glass opacity (GGO), simply consolidation, and the both changes on computed tomography (CT) scans, respectively; the proportions were similar as those in NCV and NV group (p>0.05). Only 47.1% of COVID-19 patients had both lungs pneumonia, which was significantly lower than that proportion of nearly 80% in the other two groups. COVID-19 patients presented lower proportions of increased white blood cell count (16.5%) and abnormal procalcitonin (PCT) (10.7%), and a higher proportion of decreased lymphocyte count (44.0%) compared with the other two groups. Conclusion: Majority clinical characteristics of pediatric COVID-19 pneumonia patients were milder than non-COVID-19 patients. However, lymphocytopenia remained a prominent feature of COVID-19 pediatric pneumonia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Child , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Virol Sin ; 35(6): 758-767, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1217478

ABSTRACT

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is an essential method for specific diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unfortunately, false negative test results are often reported. In this study, we attempted to determine the principal causes leading to false negative results of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNAs in respiratory tract specimens. Multiple sputum and throat swab specimens from 161 confirmed COVID-19 patients were tested with a commercial fluorescent RT-PCR kit targeting the ORF1ab and N regions of SARS-CoV-2 genome. The RNA level of a cellular housekeeping gene ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p30 (RPP30) in these specimens was also assessed by RT-PCR. Data for a total of 1052 samples were retrospectively re-analyzed and a strong association between positive results in SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests and high level of RPP30 RNA in respiratory tract specimens was revealed. By using the ROC-AUC analysis, we identified Ct cutoff values for RPP30 RT-PCR which predicted false negative results for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR with high sensitivity (95.03%-95.26%) and specificity (83.72%-98.55%) for respective combination of specimen type and amplification reaction. Using these Ct cutoff values, false negative results could be reliably identified. Therefore, the presence of cellular materials, likely infected host cells, are essential for correct SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR in patient specimens. RPP30 could serve as an indicator for cellular content, or a surrogate indicator for specimen quality. In addition, our results demonstrated that false negativity accounted for a vast majority of contradicting results in SARS-CoV-2 RNA test by RT-PCR.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Autoantigens/genetics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , China/epidemiology , Humans , Negative Results , Polyproteins/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reference Standards , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Ribonuclease P/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viral Proteins/genetics
13.
Clin Respir J ; 15(8): 904-914, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1199651

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 79 million people and killed exceeding 1.7 million people around the world by the end of 2020. METHOD: We obtained the clinical data of all diagnosed patients and lung function test of followed-up patients in Fuyang, Anhui province to investigate laboratory predictors of severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the impairment of lung function. RESULTS: Of the 155 patients, 87 (56.13%) were males. The mean age was 41.95 (SD 15.34) years. Only 30 (19.35%) patients had the critical condition. Fever (84.52%) was the most common symptoms, and short of breath was more common in severe patients (p < 0.01). Lymphopenia was observed in most patients (74, 47.7%). It showed the elevation of CRP in 100 (64.5%) patients, the elevation of SAA or IL-6 in 104 (67.1%) patients. The calculated cut-off value of CRP was 19.35 mg/ml, the AUC was 0.777, sensitivity was 73.3%, specificity was 69.6%; SAA was 73.55 mg/L, 0.679, 83.3%, 56.8%, respectively; IL-6 was 18.85 pg/ml, 0.797, 83.3%, 64.8%; D-Dimer was 0.325 mg/L, 0.673, 66.7% and 68.8%. The combination of CRP, SAA, IL-6, and D-Dimer was 0.823 in AUC, 73.3% in sensitivity, and 78.4% in specificity. 12 (42.86%) followed-up patients had completely normal lung function indicators. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP, SAA, IL-6 and D-Dimer can be predictors to severe COVID-19. The combination of these four indicators can improve the effectivity and specificity of assessing severe COVID-19. Most of the followed-up patients showed no abnormalities in lung function test. Abnormal lung function is mainly reflected in the diffusion function.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Female , Humans , Lung , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Aging (Albany NY) ; 13(7): 9265-9276, 2021 03 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1156226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dysregulated immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are thought to underlie the progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We sought to further characterize host antiviral and cytokine gene expression in COVID-19 patients based on illness severity. METHODS: In this case-control study, we retrospectively analyzed 46 recovered COVID-19 patients and 24 healthy subjects (no history of COVID-19) recruited from the Second People's Hospital of Fuyang City. Blood samples were collected from each study participant for RNA extraction and PCR. We assessed changes in antiviral gene expression between healthy controls and patients with mild/moderate (MM) and severe/critical (SC) disease. RESULTS: We found that type I interferon signaling (IFNA2, TLR8, IFNA1, IFNAR1, TLR9, IRF7, ISG15, APOBEC3G, and MX1) and genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines (IL12B, IL15, IL6, IL12A and IL1B) and chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL11 and CXCL10) were upregulated in patients with MM and SC disease. Moreover, we found that IFNA1, apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G), and Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD) were significantly downregulated (P < 0.05) in the SC group compared to the MM group. We also observed that microRNA (miR)-155 and miR-130a levels were markedly higher in the MM group compared to the SC group. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 is associated with the activation of host antiviral genes. Induction of the IFN system appears to be particularly important in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection, as decreased expression of IFNA1, APOBEC3G and FADD genes in SC patients, relative to MM patients, may be associated with disease progression.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/immunology , Immunity, Innate , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/genetics , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/immunology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cytokines/genetics , Cytokines/immunology , Female , Humans , Interferon Type I/genetics , Interferon Type I/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Transcriptome , Up-Regulation
15.
Front Med ; 15(3): 486-494, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1122810

ABSTRACT

Tocilizumab has been reported to attenuate the "cytokine storm" in COVID-19 patients. We attempted to verify the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab therapy in COVID-19 and identify patients most likely to benefit from this treatment. We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label multicenter trial among COVID-19 patients. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab in addition to standard care or standard care alone. The cure rate, changes of oxygen saturation and interference, and inflammation biomarkers were observed. Thirty-three patients were randomized to the tocilizumab group, and 32 patients to the control group. The cure rate in the tocilizumab group was higher than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (94.12% vs. 87.10%, rate difference 95% CI-7.19%-21.23%, P = 0.4133). The improvement in hypoxia for the tocilizumab group was higher from day 4 onward and statistically significant from day 12 (P = 0.0359). In moderate disease patients with bilateral pulmonary lesions, the hypoxia ameliorated earlier after tocilizumab treatment, and less patients (1/12, 8.33%) needed an increase of inhaled oxygen concentration compared with the controls (4/6, 66.67%; rate difference 95% CI-99.17% to-17.50%, P = 0.0217). No severe adverse events occurred. More mild temporary adverse events were recorded in tocilizumab recipients (20/34, 58.82%) than the controls (4/31, 12.90%). Tocilizumab can improve hypoxia without unacceptable side effect profile and significant influences on the time virus load becomes negative. For patients with bilateral pulmonary lesions and elevated IL-6 levels, tocilizumab could be recommended to improve outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
16.
Natl Sci Rev ; 7(10): 1527-1539, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1114859

ABSTRACT

In this population-based study, we identified 307 confirmed COVID-19 cases from massive surveillance, including 129 551 individuals screened at fever clinics or returning from Hubei and 3710 close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 patients. Among them, 17 patients were asymptomatic at initial clinical assessment. These asymptomatic patients on admission accounted for a small proportion of all patients (5.54%) with relatively weak transmissibility, and the detection rate was 0.35 per 100 close contacts. Moreover, the dynamics of symptoms of the 307 patients showed that the interval from symptom remission to the final negativity of viral nucleic acid was 5.0 days (interquartile range 2.0 to 11.0 days), with 14 patients (4.56%) having re-detectable viral RNA after discharge. Overall, our findings suggested asymptomatic carriers and presymptomatic patients only accounted for a small proportion of COVID-19 patients. Also, the asymptomatic phase during recovery from COVID-19 implied that negativity in viral RNA is necessary as a de-isolation criterion and follow-up is recommended.

19.
China Tropical Medicine ; 20(9):861-866, 2020.
Article in Chinese | GIM | ID: covidwho-890730

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the cases diagnosed with COVID-19 in Fuyang city, we provide scientific basis for the next step of prevention and control measures. Methods Complete data of COVID-19 cases were collected by February 14, 2020, and their epidemiology and related clinical symptoms were analyzed. Results A total of 120 COVID-19 cases were collected, of which 23 mild cases (19.2%), 73 normal cases (60.8%), 20 severe cases (16.7%), 4 critical cases (3.3%), and no death cases. There were 64 males (53.3%) and 56 females (46.7%). The age range was 1-82 years, mainly between 20 and 59 years (77.5%). January 25 was the peak incidence of the disease, and mainly occurred in January 24 to February 1. Farmers accounted for 50.0% (60 cases), followed by self-employed (10.8%) and housework and unemployment (9.2%);students (9 cases) accounted for 7.5%. Cases occurred in 3 districts and 5 counties, the top three were Linquan county (30.8%), Funan county (25.0%) and Yingzhou district (14.2%). 53 cases (44.2%) had a history of Wuhan-related exposure. Among the clinical symptoms, 89 (74.2%) had fever, 37 (30.8%) had dry cough and 18 (15.0%) had phlegm. Conjunctival congestion was present in 4 cases (3.3%). The time range from onset to first in treatment was 0-13 days, with a median time of 1 day;Onset to hospitalization was 0-18 days, median duration 3.5 days. Onset to diagnosis 0-20 days, median time 6 days. At the time of admission, 81 (67.5%) had normal white blood cells, 35 (29.2%) decreased white blood cells, and 59 (49.2%) decreased lymphocytes. CT examination showed bilateral pneumonia in 97 patients (80.8%), and multiple spots and ground glass shadows in 25 patients (20.8%). Conclusion sThe general characteristics of COVID-19 in Fuyang city are similar to that of the whole country, but there are differences. Relevant departments should adjust the next step of prevention, control and treatment strategies timely, according to the specific epidemic characteristics and relevant clinical characteristics of the local cases.

20.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 51(3): e13435, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-868107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the value of high-flow nasal cannula (HNFC) oxygen therapy in treating patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). METHODS: The clinical data of 22 patients with severe COVID-19 were collected. The heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and oxygenation index (PO2 /FiO2 ) at 0, 6, 24 and 72 hours after treatment were compared between the HFNC oxygen therapy group and the conventional oxygen therapy (COT) group. In addition, the white blood cell (WBC) count, lymphocyte (L) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were compared before and at 72 hours after oxygen therapy treatment. RESULTS: The differences at 0 hours between the two groups were not statistically significant. Compared with COT group,in the HFNC oxygen therapy group, HR, RR and PaO2 /FiO2 were better at 6 hours after treatment, PaO2 /FiO2 was better at 24 and 72 hours. After 72 hours, L and CRP had improved in the HFNC oxygen therapy group compared with the COT group, but the differences in WBC and PCT were not statistically significant. The length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the total length of hospitalization was shorter in the HFNC oxygen therapy group than in the COT group. CONCLUSION: Compared with COT, early application of HFNC oxygen therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 can improve oxygenation and RR, and HFNC oxygen therapy can improve the infection indexes of patients and reduce the length of stay in the ICU of patients. Therefore, it has high clinical application value.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Heart Rate/physiology , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen/blood , Respiratory Rate/physiology , Blood Gas Analysis , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/physiopathology , Cannula , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Partial Pressure , Procalcitonin/blood , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL